The 3×3 Magic Cube is the best-selling puzzle toy in history. It was invented by Hungarian sculptor Erno Rubik in 1974 and has since become a global phenomenon.

The first step is to put the corners in their correct positions. This is done by finding a center piece with 2 colors and performing the right 4-moves.


A classic colour-matching puzzle that’s perfect for on the go, at home or in the office. The aim is to twist and turn until each side has only one solid colour. There are 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 ways to arrange the cube – but only one solution.

Solving a Cube requires memorising sequences of moves, known as algorithms. These typically have a desired effect (such as swapping two corners) but may also have side effects (such as changing the position of some centres). Advanced solutions are usually much faster than basic ones, and rely on more sophisticated algorithms.

For example, some algorithms involve moving a centre piece to its correct location by performing a sequence such as LO T RO CO. This is also known as Wolstenholme notation, and makes it easier to remember the sequences for novices. Alternatively, there are simpler notation systems such as Thistlethwaite or Kociemba notation that remove the need for centres to have positions fixed and allow for more intuitive movement.


There are approximately 519 quintillion[53] different arrangements of the 27 tiny cubelets that make up a 3×3 speedcube. However, only one in twelve of these arrangements are solvable.

While the puzzle may seem daunting at first, it’s important to remember that there is an algorithm for solving it. The first step involves orienting the center pieces and matching them with the edge colors. The next step is putting the corner pieces in their correct position.

For those who prefer a simpler starting place, we recommend the D-FantiX 2×2 Speed Cube, which ditches stickers and uses a frosted surface that’s easier to distinguish (and lasts longer than stickers can). It also has adjustable tension and is pre-lubricated for smoother operation.

For advanced cubers, we offer the YJ Magnetic 3×3 by YJ. It’s WCA and Non-WCA approved, with high quality magnets that ensure crisp movements. Its frosted finish is brighter than standard cubes, making it easy to identify your favorite color combinations.


The weight of a magic cube can be an important factor in choosing the right one for your needs. A lighter cube will be more convenient to use, but it may also have less durability. A heavier cube, on the other hand, will be more durable but will not be as fast to solve.

Many models of magic cubes are available in different shapes and sizes to suit a variety of audiences. For example, the 2×2 cube is a small model that is ideal for children, while the 3×3 cube is larger and more suitable for older children and adults.

In addition to developing motor skills, the magic cube also helps develop observational capacity and improves spatial awareness. This is because the puzzle requires you to look closely at each face of the cube in order to correctly move the corner pieces. This is a great way to improve your attention and concentration. It is also a good way to keep your mind active and stimulate your memory.


Assembling a 3×3 speed cube can be super frustrating if you are a beginner. It’s important to follow the instructions exactly to avoid putting the puzzle together incorrectly.

The cube was invented by Hungarian architecture professor Erno Rubik in 1974, who used it as a teaching tool to help students understand three-dimensional spaces. Today, the Rubik’s Cube is a worldwide phenomenon and a popular mental exercise and puzzle that can be enjoyed by people of all ages.

To assemble the cube, first screw in one of the center pieces. This will make it easier to move the corner and edge pieces around. Then, you can assemble the rest of the cube. When you are done, all that remains is to twist in the last layer and hear it click into place. This method works much faster than the beginner’s algorithm, and is recommended by cubers of all levels of experience. Also, it’s more efficient than the cross method.