You wish to secure your business and physical properties and believe that security guards are the “best” bet to secure your properties. There are various pros and cons of security guards guarding your business and residential homes. Relying on what sort of accountability and risk you’re ready to take on, you may discover uniformed security guards cost your properties more than their salaries. Let’s get into the drawbacks of settling for a security guard as your primary security solution.
Limitations of Hiring Security Guards/ Services
Advanced Live Video Surveillance Systems Present Multiple Same Benefits, that too, Without the Huge Retainer or Paycheck
There are only a few insignificant security guards that recent live surveillance systems can’t replicate at a fraction of the expense. Video cameras or CCTV installed in high visibility public areas present the identical visual deterrent that a security guard does, without the salary obligations that a human presence forces. Besides that, a few live video surveillance services come with audible deterrents from speakers, signaling trespassers that all their actions are monitored.
Security Guards or Services Expose Businesses to Greater Liability and Insurance Costs.
A uniformed security guard’s presence at the property can imply physical injuries to the accused trespasser and the guard himself. While most jurisdictions acknowledge that security guards use a “sensible measure of force” to examine the situation and resolve physical fights, what would be deemed “sensible” is subject to interpretation. Such application of force by a private security guard could expose them to account for negligence or even physical assault. These claims would be on the peak of any workman’s compensation that the guard may file for in the event of injuries sustained at work.
On top of potential assault & attack, property owners must also acknowledge the uncertainty for wrongful detention—if a security guard holds back a trespasser without reason and property damage caused, either because of their own or someone else’s. These events and circumstances demand costly insurance to alleviate that financial risk & liability in a worst-case scenario.
Uniformed Security Services Passively Monitor Property and are Prone to Boredom-Related Failure.
The services of a security guard are inherently passive. You may see a few uniformed security guards simply waiting for misconduct to arise. However, that crime may not occur for hours, days, weeks, and even years. That kind of inactive boredom experience that security guards often makes falling unconscious incredibly simple to do, no matter the property under security. So, that myth of a security guard befalling asleep mid-shift because of stable boredom might appear similar to a stereotypical joke.
However, it’s a natural, general dilemma in the security guard industry that right away influences the security & safety of client companies and residential properties. Conversely, remote live video monitoring is an incredibly proactive protection measure. The remote security guards never become bored or say they don’t have time to get bored, as they’re invariably controlling incoming alerts from your live security feeds. Uniformed security guards are not anticipating something to occur; they’re steadily responding to the clients’ facility’s action.
Security Professionals Lack Evidence of Their Encounters
When the worst happens, and a dispute occurs, it can be complicated to reveal what happened, when, and with/ to whom. Burglars may lie to the authorities respecting what occurred in an endeavor to shield their hides, and the security guard only has their information to deny the criminal’s statement. Stress hormones can interfere with memory retention even in a best-case situation where everyone attempts to supply accurate statements of a provided scenario.
Security guards or uniformed security services may not explicitly recount what happened throughout intense situations, missing crucial details that support authorities trace criminals. CCTV footage or video surveillance is phenomenal for corroborating employee records with impartial evidence. It records what is happening without considering those involved in real-time.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the decision of whether to hire professional security guards or install a surveillance monitoring system is conditioned on your property’s unique security needs. With eyes in the sky or propped on light poles at strategic regions of the property can essentially incorporate each inch of a secured area and continue to monitor no matter what other movement happens in another section of the property. But, don’t hire a security guard since you believe your property will be automatically “safer” because there’s a “real” person on-site guarding your place.
