What is the Difference Between Wikipedia and Wikimedia?

Depending on which source you look at, you will see that Wikipedia and Wikimedia both have their pros and cons. Regardless of which one you prefer, you should know that these are two different types of encyclopedias. While Wikipedia was initially established as a way to keep all of the information in one place, Wikimedia has expanded to include communities of users who can collaborate and create new information.

USA have the largest population of readers and editors

Across all of the Wikimedia projects, the United States and Canada have the largest readership and editor population. This has been true for many years. These two regions represent about 8% of the global internet population.

In the past ten years, Wikipedia has become a global phenomenon. Its pages are written by around 85,000 volunteers across the globe. Some of these pages are used by search engines to display search results. Others are used by Wikipedia readers to gain knowledge.

Wikipedia’s medical content is also extensive. It has over one billion bytes of text and 155,000 articles. These articles are supported by 950,000 references.

Wikipedia’s medical content is concentrated in English. However, it is also available in 255 other languages. The average article on the site contains more than a million words.

Despite the fact that Wikipedia’s medical content is the most extensive, it’s only a small fraction of all the articles on the site. The Wikipedia system of sites holds 22 million articles in 282 languages. This is less than half of the world’s total articles.

Wikipedia is a collaborative resource that has revolutionized the way humans access information. It is also the only viable model for dealing with healthcare information. In addition to providing free access to knowledge, Wikipedia has partnered with the World Health Organization to make its content available for public use.

Wikipedia has adapted its philosophy of openness

Originally a wiki created by Jimmy Wales and Larry Sanger, Wikipedia is a free online encyclopedia. It is a multilingual project, and it was founded on the concept of openness.

As of April 2013, Wikipedia had over a million articles in five languages. This includes the Portuguese, Italian, Swedish, and Japanese editions. The project has also gained a reputation for containing pornographic and religiously sensitive content.

The website’s primary aim is to be a summary of human knowledge. However, it also contains images of masturbation and other sexually offensive content. This has led to criticism from some users.

In the past, Wikipedia has faced censorship from national authorities in China and Pakistan. Wikipedia’s content has also been used by some web search engines.

The site’s interface reflects the community that supports it. It includes a link wizard and a redesigned logo. It is also a reflection of the community’s development.

This replaced the original UseModWiki software, which was written in Perl by Clifford Adams. The new software was designed to meet the demands of exponentially increasing demand for information. The site was originally hosted on Linux.

The site is free to use and is operated by the Wikimedia Foundation, a non-profit organization. Wikimedia chapters are national organizations that work to promote the site. The organization publishes multilingual publications and has affiliates throughout the world.

Structured tasks are supposed to let people dip their toes in the water

Among the millions of articles churned out by Wikipedia editors each day, few are notable enough to garner the attention of a devoted fanboy or fangirl. To keep up with the competition, the Wikimedia Foundation has turned to new technology, old school chutzpah, and a slew of atypically adolescent neophytes. The foundation has released a suite of new features designed to help the next generation of Wikipedia editors make their mark. A new editor badges program will reward those who slog through the minefield, while other features like editing tools and a new mentor program will offer guidance and support for those looking to make a mark. Earlier this year, Wikimedia announced the launch of an English-language version of the popular free content encyclopedia. The site is one of the sturdiest survivors of the old web, and is still looking for the next big thing in the ever-evolving digital age. Using an innovative algorithm that combines machine learning and human inputs, Wikimedia can be a bit selective about which projects it accepts, and which it rejects. In addition to the new aforementioned features, the Wikimedia Foundation has unveiled the most coveted Wikipedia editor badges, and a handful of smaller sandboxes that can be used as guinea pigs for new entrants.

Commons celebrates quality images

Among the hundreds of Wikimedia projects, Commons stands out as the go to for a multitude of quality images. It’s not surprising, since the site is home to millions of free images, including many of the requisite megapixels. The quality of the images is matched by the quality of the content, and this is a plus for a community of enthusiasts with a diverse demographic. Likewise, Commons does a good job of enforcing policies that ensure quality is king, and users are not trolled by a mob of spambots. The community is a happy place, and it’s easy to see why.

As a bonus, the site is a multilingual marvel, making it the ideal venue for both neophytes and seasoned veterans. Besides, Commons is a well oiled machine, ensuring a steady flow of quality content. For instance, Commons boasts more than 20,000 high quality images of art. Besides, the site’s sheer scale provides the perfect platform for collaborative research. It’s also a good place to make a name for yourself. If you’re looking for an outlet to showcase your skills, consider joining the Commons community!

Interwiki links function the same way as namespaces

Whether you are using a wiki, a Wikimedia project or a Commons, Interwiki links are a great way to link to pages of other projects and to content that is not on this wiki. For example, if you have an article on a wiki in German, you can use an Interwiki link to create an English version of the article.

This feature is available in many Wikimedia projects. For example, you can use interwiki links to link to articles on the Commons, Wikispecies, Wikibooks or Wiktionary. These links function much like namespaces. For example, you can use a Help:Interwiki link to link to articles on Wikipedia in a different language.

Interlanguage links are not reciprocal. You can use the same prefix to refer to content on another wiki, but it is not a guarantee that the link will work. In addition, you can delete a link that has no content.

There are different prefixes for each project. Some have acquired specialized uses. For example, a Wikiquote is included in the standard MediaWiki interwiki table, but does not have its own namespace prefix. However, it can be used as an Interwiki link to the English version of Wikiquote.

A few languages have their own namespaces. For example, Spanish has a dedicated namespace called Wikispecies. However, most languages will not have their own namespace. A dedicated namespace allows searches in many pages created in a language.